I looked at these proofs, here's what i found. Only one of them (#5) refers to crimes in National Forests where two men were murdered. So you have two verified deaths by a lone mentally disturbed man who was growing opium. That article goes on to make lots of vague acusations with out any evidence or proof. It might all be true, but it offers no proof and doesn't give any specifics of any other crimes.
Most of them are about crimes near Murder Mountain, which is on private property not the National Forests!!
Out of the millions of visitors to CA National Forests, you found evidence of two murders. Maybe that's enough to keep some people from visiting them but it won't bother me at all.
Bob
1) This report is
just outside Fresno and has nothing to do with National Forests. I'd agree with you that cities are a terrible place to live if that is your point:
http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/apexchange/2013/02/09/ca--marijuana-farms-laotian-growers.html
2) This one is about a guy named Garrett going missing who worked on a marijuana farm and has nothing to do with National Forests. A rival farm got revenge. And it's about
Murder Mountaiin and in the post below we find out Murder Mountain is in a subdivision, not the NF.
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2014/09/11/humboldt-countys-murder-mountain-in-marijuana-country-living-up-to-its-name/
3)This one appears to be a blog with a lot of vague accusations without a single verifiable fact in it that I can find.
http://www.3ammagazine.com/politica/2002_jun/pot_county.html
She's where you got this statement:
"People shoot at cars they don't know. At people they don't know. Deep graves in the backwoods nobody's gonna find. And it does happen, unfortunately, because people are stupid. The greatest risk posed to growers is the theft of their crop by other growers or groups of armed local thugs, both in and out of uniform."
Nowhere is there the slightest hint of any proof of that statement, all we know is that she says it's true. It must be true because she wrote it and put it on the internet. Beyond that, there is nowhere in the article where she says it's happening in the NFs.
4) This one also has nothing to do with the National Forests. she describes right in it where the crimes took place:
"As reported by Kym Kemp, the area dubbed
"Murder Mountain" is the Rancho Sequoia subdivision near the town of Alderpoint, about 45 minutes east of the 101 and Garberville. In 1968, the mountainous land was subdivided in response to a proposed dam project that was never built. Marijuana farmers snapped up lots as small as ten acres, and soon the area became notorious for law enforcement raids and rampant criminality."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/high-times/murder-mayhem-marijuana_b_4228303.html
This is about crimes in a subdivision, not in the NF!!!
The marijuana farmers bought and own that land. Unless you are trespassing on private property, you are at no risk!!! You quoted this:
"Humboldt County police and private investigators are working to find
Garrett, but investigator Chris Cook doesn't have much hope he'll be found alive, remarking to the Lost Coast Outpost that, "Is he alive? Probably not... I really want people to know that if you are coming up here, you could be taking your life in your hands."
This is the guy above who was a marijuana farmer and was murdered by a rival farmer. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE National Forests
5) Okay, this one actually is about the NF and two men who were killed in it.
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/sep/04/local/la-me-fort-bragg-20110904 Here is how they describe the suspect:
"Two weeks later, Melo, 69, was gunned down. The suspect, Aaron Bassler, 35, was described by his father as
schizophrenic and possibly also involved in Coleman's death. He had a bunker in the area and
had been tending not marijuana but about 100 opium poppies, said Mendocino County Sheriff's Capt. Kurt Smallcomb. Melo was shot close by."
So you have two verified deaths by a lone mentally disturbed man who was growing opium. The article goes on to make lots of vague acusations with out any evidence or proof. It might all be true, but it offers no proof and doesn't give any specifics of any other crimes.
6) I don't understand why you included this one at all. It doesn't make reference to any crimes. In fact the author concludes that maijuana farmers should not be armed.
http://www.marijuanagrowershq.com/what-is-the-best-firearm-for-marijuana-garden-defense/