The cost of replacement battery packs is not normally a consideration. They last more than a decade and not only you, but 100% of battery experts cannot predict the cost of any battery pack a decade from now.A Tesla NCA battery is built to last 300k to 500k miles. The LFP battery (only on the M3 RWD) should get double that.
Battery replacement is 15k to 20k.
It cost 3k to replace our Prius battery at 495k miles (not a typo).
There will be zero coal fired EVs by 2050 as coal is dead soon. There will also be 100's of thousands of battery chargers by the time we need them, mostly solar powered.Yep, and coal-powered EVs WILL be paying their fair share of road taxes...some day...or at least, we can hope.
This new full scale government build-out of the EV charging network is mostly courtesy of VW. As part of the dieselgate fiasco, one of the settlement terms is that Volkswagen is paying billions for the new EV charging network.
Ironic, isnt it, that selling all those 'dirty' diesel cars is helping to provide an infrastructure (called Electrify America) for dirty coal-burning EVs.
Remember, the EV is not really zero emission.
We didn't actually remove the pollution, we just moved it.
At present, PV installations are cheaper than new coal plants, it's only a matter of time. Power companies will have to figure out the grid storage thing to completely transition over. I suspect in the coming decades having battery storage and rooftop solar will become the norm for new homes. Small battery storage banks widely distributed can be linked together to make virtual grid storage (Tesla has a pilot in CA for this).There will be zero coal fired EVs by 2050 as coal is dead soon. There will also be 100's of thousands of battery chargers by the time we need them, mostly solar powered.
There will be zero coal fired EVs by 2050 as coal is dead soon. There will also be 100's of thousands of battery chargers by the time we need them, mostly solar powered.
coal is dead soon
Coal is coming a bit un-dead, too, because of the repercussions of the war in Ukraine.Your crystal ball needs a tune-up, me thinks.
China is the largest producer of renewable power. So by the time old man USA goes to ZERO coal so will the rest of the world.India, Russia, and China are large consumers of coal for electricity generation. So even if the USA went to ZERO electricity produced from coal, there will still be large populations burning coal and other hydrocarbons to juice up the EV in the driveway.
Nothing made in China lasts 40 years.China currently has 43 new coal fired power plants under construction; US is not building any.
Life expectancy of a coal plant is ~40 years.
Coal accounts for 58% of China's power; India = 70%; US = 22%
Solar accounts for 3.5% of China's power; India = 7%; US = 3.1%.
China and India will be using coal long after the US retires theirs.
Agree, in general. I've always floated the following ideas as how I think this can shake out:There is no good reason for humanity to continue using fossil fuels (except nuclear, if you consider that a fossil fuel) in the long term. <snip>
.There is no good reason for humanity...
.
Agreed!
.
Our species are locusts, consuming everything in our path.
Name any problem... the solution is less humans:
* factory fishing -- less humans.
* Colorado River -- less humans.
* HIV, polio, monkeypox -- less humans.
* air pollution, weather dithering, The Ozone Layer© -- less humans.
.
One example:
* open-pit mines employing children to harvest elements required to manufacture batteries.
Another example:
* coal mines, and 24/7/360° mile-long railroad trains of coal transported to electric power plants.
Another example:
* bio-mass electric power plants, requiring a constant supply of trees from forests, creating a 'stump-farm', requiring re-planting of GMO quick-grow trees... eliminating any opportunity for fallen trees to enrich the forest soil, inevitably causing a desert.
.
Each decision has consequences.
In a closed system -- such as this particular planet -- every consequence inevitably creates a myriad of interlocking downstream non-predictable consequences.
.
I welcome your rebuttal.
I hope soon we will have affordable EV RVs and vans ... there are a few EV vans out already, mostly with shorter range, but the VW one coming out does have a good range. IMO people doing full time van / RV life probably have a lower carbon footprint compared to someone living in an apartment or house simply because of the much lower electricity usage from not having AC, especially if using solar. I suppose that doesn't apply to everyone though if they are driving a ton more. Personally, I'm driving less than before because I stick in one small area most of the time.A better question is when will EV-RVs be at a price point we can afford?
I can afford about $20,000 without too much pain, $30,000 by severely reducing my spending. $40,000+ is out of reach (I will not go into heavy debt for a vehicle).
Enter your email address to join: