AuricTech said:
It looks like the only difference is that one has Z-brackets for mounting the panels.
After a derating factor of .77, 200W of PV panel would give you a charge rate of about 10.6% for a 100Ah battery, and about 8.5% for a 125Ah battery. 10%-13% is considered optimal for a full-time off-grid system. Here's the formula I used (which I found on the forum to which my sig file links):
.77w/vh = r
v=charging volts (for 12V system, use 14.5)
h=battery capacity in Amp-hours
r=rate of charge (decimal fraction)
w=Array size in Watts
I've not visited the NAWS forums for a while, but a while back 5 to 13% of capacity was stated as the ideal for an off grid system. Good to see they bumped up this rate.
While any solar is better than no solar, having too little for the amount of battery capacity is detrimental to the batteries compared to more for less.
I used to have 130 watts feeding 230 AH of storage, then 198 watts feeding 230AH of storage, and now 198 watts feeding 130AH of storage.
I am getting the best lifespan out of the single 130 amp hour battery, despite it being cycled deeper each night and I can only barely touch the 10% rate via solar.
Beware that some High$$ AGM batteries recommend extreme minimum recharge rates when deeply cycled. Odyssey recommends a minimum of 40 amps for 100 AH of storage, Lifeline says a minimum of 20AH per 100AH of storage. Both these batteries say more is better, and that pretty much no charging source available to a consumer is going to charge at too high a rate for the battery to handle, as long as the voltage is controlled to no more than 14.7 for Odyssey and 14.4 for lifeline.
Lower$$ AGMS can say no more than 30 amps per 100 amp hours of storage, which might mean they make a better solar only battery. but a battery requiring a 40% rate minimum surely does not make for a good solar only deeply cycled battery.
As always, find the battery manufacturer charging recommendations and make an attempt to meet them. If the charge rate via solar is well below the 10 to 13% recommendation, but there are other higher amp charging sources employed when the batteries are depleted, then this is better for the batteries and solar rates below 10% are more acceptable, but still far from ideal.
It is not just a matter of replacing the amp hours used plus some percentage, but meeting a minimum charge rate.
Some people act like the solar controller going into float mode before noon is wasteful, but this is actually best for the batteries, as it leaves a bigger buffer for worse weather, and Since most unprogrammable controllers are Timid in their charge algorithms, with absorption voltages too low and applied for too short a duration. Amps required to hold float voltages are a mere fraction of what they are to hold absorption voltages. So the batteries are screaming for more time at 14.X, and the controller ignores this chanting 'I know what's best for you' and allows 13.2v only.
Almost all automatic charging sources, whether they be super 'smart' grid powered 11 stage chargers, or a 200+$ MPPT solar controller, Stop applying Absorption voltages well before the battery has reached the 99%+ range.
The person who can change the absorption duration and voltage has the happiest batteries, and this absorption duration is different among different batteries, and this also changes as they age, So No one size fits all charging algorithm will perfectly recharge any given battery. The controller setpoints from the factory are timid, designed to not overcharge any given battery.
Do not believe the flashing green light. It lies to soothe you.
It is very easy to undercharge a battery, and then flash a green light to sooth the human, but actually fully charging a lead acid battery requires more for longer and a skeptical human, with a hydrometer, or an ammeter and a voltmeter to know when the batteries themselves would allow the soothing green light to flash.
With Solar, more is Better, and just enough, only is, on the best days. Less than Ideal starves batteries and can greatly impact their cycle life.
All charging sources possible should be employed/utilized to return lead acid batteries to the highest possible state of charge at all times, for best battery lifespan. Alternator, Solar, and grid powered charging sources should all be utilized, and all can work together towards this goal of 100% state of charge, as often as possible.
This would be ideal, but the world is not, and few systems are, so don't stress achieving perfection, it is not as if the batteries will die in 5 cycles if not recharged ideally. What one wants to avoid is chronic daily undercharging, and just believing the soothing but lying green light.