Seraphim
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2011
- Messages
- 2,610
- Reaction score
- 0
A couple of thoughts from someone with a bit of experience:<br><br>A self-defense weapon is only helpful if you have it the moment you need it, and can bring it into play very quickly. Rifles and shotguns have their functions, but can't be carried full time nor brought into play as quickly as a handgun. Something to consider reference your personal situation.<br><br>A revolver offers a variety of ammunition options not always available to an automatic (misnamed lol) handgun. Bird shot shells, for example, cannot feed into the chamber of any automatic I'm familiar with. (Someone correct me if they have knowledge I don't). While the high capacity magazine of an automatic might be comforting, if you're in in a situation you require that many rounds you're in over your head and should have considered running before shooting *grin*. Revolvers tend to be more dependable than autos, especially since they don't depend on a spring loaded magazine.<br><br>Consider the size and type of ammuntion. A 9mm ball round is fast and penetrates, but too much penetration does not equate to stopping power, which is effectively what is required in a personal defense situation. Example: a friend and I were doing caliber tests shootinf at concrete blocks. My copper clad 9mm rounds were punching nice neat holes in the blocks. His unclad .45 round hit the block, made an impression in the concrete, and the block fell into several pieces. That's stopping power. Legally, you're shooting to stop an attacker's actions, not 'shooting to kill.' A phrase to remember. Once he stops attacking, you stop shooting.<br><br>I've carried a gun professonally for 2/3 of my life. I don't carry one off-duty. If I did, it would be a Charter Arms Bulldog: a small, five round revolver available in .44 special caliber (NOT magnum), loaded with wadcutter or semi-wadcutter rounds. Less penetration, high impact effect.<br><br>Just my $.02.<br><br><br><br><br><br>