I understand personal protection quite well. I have half a dozen hand guns, and over the course of a decade or so, spent several thousands of dollars attending training classes. I have somewhere between 240 and 300 hours of such training.
My problem with the Judge is that it's an attempt to combine two different types of guns in one. It's needlessly large and heavy for a personal defense gun, and the presence of rifling in the barrel SEVERELY degrades any utility it has as a shotgun.
45 Colt is a fine self defense round, more than adequate. I doubt that any 410 shotshell can improve on it.
As general rule, I tend to agree with you about magazine articles. They never have anything bad to say about any gun, lest they offend an advertiser.
So when one DOES publish a negative review, I tend to take it seriously.
Plus, the article was written by Tom Givens of Rangemaster, a man I have met and trained with, and have a great deal of respect for.
When someone I know and trust has tested something and says "It doesn't work.", I don't feel any need to spend my own good money to repeat his tests.
Let me ask you the same questions I asked VanTramp. Have you actually patterned it with shotshells on paper? What kind of patterns did you get?
Regards
John
On the subject of shotshells and snakes . . .
As I currently live in the northeast, I've never felt a need for such protection. When I hit the road, I plan to spend much time in the desert southwest.
I've been thinking about getting one of those Bond Arms Snakeslayer derringers.
Theoretically, since there will be little or no rifling to interact with the shotshell, It should give decent patterns to a reasonable range. Plus, it should be light and handy to carry on hikes (along with my Glock).
Anybody here got any experience with one?
Regards
John