<br>He replied with:<br><span class="quote"><span class="quote">I'm confused why recombinant catalysts would void warranty when I've seen sealed lead acid batteries on the trojan website. Do these batteries not use recombination?</span><br><br><span class="quote">Would you mind telling me which contaminants are produced by recombinant catalysts? Of the dozen or so studies I've read not one has mentioned anything like this so a source would be a nice read. It seems simple enough to convert hydrogen and oxygen fumes into water.</span>
</span><br><br>Pretty good answer I think. I'll still go with their batteries but I'll have to revert to a ventilation system. I did look around for LiFePO4 batteries and found some good cells here.<br><br>http://www.ev-power.eu/CALB-40Ah-400Ah/SE400AHA-Lithium-Cell-LiFePO4-3-2V-400Ah.html<br><br>The cost would be about $4200 (approx. 3-4x as much) at the same capacity, but they have the advantages of being maintenance free, safer, and live almost twice as long. Something else that's useful about them is that they're only 70mm thick and can be side orientated, so essentially they could fit under the floor and take up no noticeable space. It seems like the more responsible approach is LiFePO4, it's just not as cost-effective. There's no way I can afford that on top of everything else. It's something to consider further down the line, not so useful at this point and time.Our recombination batteries do this internally under pressure created by the pressure relief valves. Recombination caps have a chemical additive which could cause contamination to the battery. Also, it has been know that when used in cold conditions, the collective moisture in the cap can freeze preventing the release of pressure.
Enter your email address to join: