I am not sure why you plan on cycling the engine battery, but if you plan on doing so, get a marine battery as they are a dual purpose. Not quite deep cycle, not quite starting, but a compromise, and closer to starting.<br><br>My Van says I only need a 550 CCA battery. I have a group 27 marine battery in there with 650 CCA. A regular Starting battery of that size would have about 750+ CCA. True deep cycle batteries rarely give CCA figures. Trojan does, their 27 is 620 CCA. As long as the deep cycle battery can exceed the minimum CCA, there is no danger in using it as a starting battery. <br><br>I try to not allow my house batteries to assist in engine starting, but when they do, I probably have about 1500 CCA remaining, and the slightest blip of the starter, the engine catches.<br><br>I never discharge this engine battery. All interior lighting, stereo and ciggy receptacles have been moved to the house bank. Its only overnight loads is the memory of the engine computer. While it spent the first 23 months of its life being cycled shallowly, it has not been cycled since then, and will be 6 years old in July. Pretty surprising as the 2 other matched batteries I bought at the same time failed at 12 and 23 months.<br><br>My current batteries(Crown) when thirsty, do accept a LOT of current from the alternator, but for relatively short periods of time. They really seem to behave better when fed these huge currents initially then have the solar top them off the rest of the day. And better than when my 25 amp Schumacher charger brings them to full. I think the physical agitation of driving while being charged better destratifies the electrolyte and dissolved the sulfates back into the electrolyte.<br><br>Just yesterday, My alternator made a big contribution morning and late afternoon but my battery monitor still read 15 a/h from full when I parked overnight. At 11:30 at night at 38 amp hours from full they were still reading 12.5. Without the driving I would see 12.4 or less, and that is even when they started out at 0 amp hours from full.<br><br>I know the low and slow method of battery charging is touted as best for the batteries. My observations do not agree. I think longevity might increase with low and slow, but my observation is performance decreases, and I have no qualms about exceeding Crowns recommendation of 25 amps for bulk charging. Let the batteries dictate how much they want from what is available is my opinion.<br><br><br>I am lucky that my vehicle's voltage regulator allows 14.5 volts, Which is what My batteries specify as bulk/acceptance voltages for 75 degrees F. Unfortunately it does not allow them to stay there long enough. No doubt some vehicles will behave better than others in this regard.<br><br>With a bank of batteries tacked on to the engine battery with a solenoid/relay, or isolator, the fully charged engine battery(or nearly so) can reduce the amps to the house batteries, especially if the wiring is not very thick. The thicker the wiring to the house bank, the more it will appear to the voltage regulator as if the engine battery is depleted and will allow the alternator to make maximum amps to bring the battery to 14.xx volts. With my system I can remove the engine battery so that the alternator is feeding only the depleted house batteries, and this works noticeably better as 14.5 is allowed for longer and the amps required to reach it are higher, and not being shared with the engine battery.<br><br>The DC to DC converters for a second bank of batteries are nice because they allow you to set the bulk and acceptance and float voltages. But as you noted, are pricey.<br><br>Some people power an inverter with the engine battery and use a large battery charger to the second bank of batteries. This can be a case of robbing peter to pay paul though, the engine battery might get depleted, as the alternator might not be able to keep up except at highway rpms, and maybe not even then. This is popular for travel trailers whose wiring to the alternator is very long and very thin. AC wiring doesn't suffer the same voltage drop as DC circuits. Some chargers hate MSW inverters, and there is certain inefficiency in taking DC to AC, then AC back to DC again.<br><br><br>One thing to keep in mind, it is nice and easy to prepare for huge loads and capacities to meet those loads, a whole different thing to pay for it. My battery tray , below my floor, can only fit 2 group 27 batteries for 230 amp hours. I am guessing I have about 50% of that capacity left, and it is more than enough to meed my overnight demands with a good buffer. When these batteries need replacement, I might go with less capacity.<br><br>I'd really have to be wasteful and have many cloudy days without driving before I'd be in danger of my compressor fridge not running overnight.<br><br>Also note that solar panel performance degrades when panel temperature increases. Florida summertime, expect only 80% of panels rating around noon, unshaded. On a 60 degree day I might get 12.5 amps into my batteries at noon, in 85 degree day about 9.5. MPPT charge controllers can take better advantage of lower temperatures, and lower battery voltages. Higher voltage panels allow thinner cabling to the charge controller. Usually 100 watt panels are nominally 12 volt rated.<br><br>Consider getting a 1000 watt Honda generator and have less solar and battery bank. 800 lbs of batteries will really eat up your MPG. Also it requires about 1 engine HP for an alternator to make 25 amps. Asking the alternator to recharge a large bank of depleted batteries will noticeably reduce MPG, and alternator life. The quiet Honda can power a charger and use less gas than your alternator would add to your engine's consumption.<br><br>So many options....<br><br><br>