I never knew we were supposed to do that. Also, I always thought only women could enter/read the Women's Forum. Why have a Women's Forum if anyone (males & females) can read the posts?Please preface your the title of your thread with
"Women only:"
in the subject line
In order for the males not feel excluded ...? Everyone should feel comfortable & welcome & all."...I always thought only women could enter/read the Women's Forum. Why have a Women's Forum if anyone (males & females) can read the posts?
GotchaIf you'll notice, there are only 1 thread re: sex assault, 2 re: women-centric safety. In the entire Women Only Sub Heading.
So, am sure everyone feels comfortable & welcome in discussing sensitive topics here.
Because most or all of the people who control this discussion board are delicate and politically correct.Why have a Women's Forum if anyone (males & females) can read the posts?
Just seems that women may open up more, if they knew that only women would be reading the posts. Or, mostly women. Male Mods would be ok.Because most or all of the people who control this discussion board are delicate and politically correct.
Can you IMAGINE any conversations here that would be forbidden to men? They simply wouldn't allow it!
Men can see what's posted but they're not allowed to comment. There's no practical way to stop men from reading the posts. It's an open discussion board. Even if they added a question about gender and restricted access to this sub-forum to women, anyone could just change their answer to gain access. Even FB groups that are women only have problems with men attempting to gain access to their groups. Restricting the sub-forum to just women commenting is pretty much the only practical solution that I can think of anyway.I never knew we were supposed to do that. Also, I always thought only women could enter/read the Women's Forum. Why have a Women's Forum if anyone (males & females) can read the posts?
Hi Maki,All this stuff has already been talked about in earlier conversations in this women only area. I suggest people scan those historical conversations instead of pushing for regurgitation of answers.
I was an admin at a somewhat large message board. And on a FB page that was public. On this type of board (not on FB) it is very easy to make a directory private. After thinking more about it, I can see why they leave it public. Otherwise, they would need to add multiple private forums. Eg. one for menMen can see what's posted but they're not allowed to comment. There's no practical way to stop men from reading the posts. It's an open discussion board. Even if they added a question about gender and restricted access to this sub-forum to women, anyone could just change their answer to gain access. Even FB groups that are women only have problems with men attempting to gain access to their groups. Restricting the sub-forum to just women commenting is pretty much the only practical solution that I can think of anyway.
That being said, the board is under new management so if you have some idea of how it could work, I would bring it up to them. Never hurts to try.
What do you mean make it private? How would people get in?I was an admin at a somewhat large message board. And on a FB page that was public. On this type of board (not on FB) it is very easy to make a directory private. After thinking more about it, I can see why they leave it public. Otherwise, they would need to add multiple private forums. Eg. one for men
It's probably hard enough to find Mods as it is.
... Can you IMAGINE any conversations here that would be forbidden to men? They simply wouldn't allow it.
You set parameters. If, when ppl sign up (register) for the Forum, they list themselves as female, they are allowed to access this sub-forum. Nobody else has access, except the Mods & Admin. If no sex is listed, then no access.
R
If that doesn't work, the Mods can manually add names to allow access. You send a PM to a Mod, or to the Forum, requesting admission to the Women's Forum.
I don't understand that point of view. An atmosphere of exclusivity? And it would create conflict? I don't get it. I'll ask my daughter her POV, because she corrects me if I'm wrong about these kinds of thingsI really don’t see a benefit here in creating a sub forum that worked vigorously to identify and exclude unwanted others of any ilk, and this would seem to be a massive and ongoing undertaking for the moderators.
It would also seem tailor made to create conflict and an atmosphere of exclusivity in this forum that otherwise works very hard to be inclusive.
I am not a Facebook user, but understand their platform has the ability to create private pages that only members can view and post to.
There is also private messaging here, and email, plus groups that can meet in various private forms to speak to issues one wouldn’t want to post and discuss publicly.
My two cents.
Nothing you said was offensive. I'm slow to see both sides sometimes. Trying to understand.If I offended anyone, I apologize.
Enter your email address to join: