barleyguy said:Sure. I never said otherwise, nor was this ever a topic I argued.
The "constitutional right to travel" means that a state can't keep you from leaving, or from traveling in general, without due process. There have been many cases involving the method of travel, such as whether you're allowed to drive or whether you're allowed to fly on a plane without ID. Those cases haven't been successful that I know of. But if for example, you are a passenger in somebody else's car, riding on a bus, or driving with a legal license, you have a constitutional right to do so, and that right can't be taken away without due process, which means a trial and a court order.
Ok... but... if you point people to a google search for "constitutional right to travel," one of the first things they will get from such a search are sites claiming that you don't need a driver's license. These "sovereign" sites tell people that there is no requirement to have a driver's license because of some bogus difference between "drive" and "travel." Try the google search yourself...
And then there is still the claim you made in the other post about quarantine orders being illegal...
... but if you say you're not a sovereign citizen, then you're not...