Richard
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 3, 2016
- Messages
- 274
- Reaction score
- 2
Queen said:Try to understand that your focus and your fears are not universal.
If I may step into this particular vein of conversation...
The facts are universal. And they apply across the board to all of us, whether we're focused on them, or fearful of them, or not. This becomes an important point in a moment...
Queen said:It's great that you're interested in this and passionate about it, but also respect that my view is different.
When it comes to facts, individual views are largely irrelevant. Simply put, 2 + 2 = 4; no 'individual view' necessary
Queen said:I simply do not care about any of this
Well, caring or not caring is a personal choice. No one can take that from you. That said, it's hard to see how one might consider oneself part of a community and yet not care when something affects that community detrimentally. Please don't misunderstand me here: I'm not presuming anything about whether you're part of the community. That's not for me to say. Instead, I'm pointing to an apparent conflict between the ideas of 'being a member of a community' and 'not-caring about something that hurts the community'. Can you see where this is leading?
Queen said:if you need to name that based on your experience, that is your thing, not mine.
Actually, 'naming that' has been a fairly consistent trend over time. Regarding Athenian democracy, their culture made a point of distinguishing between members who took seriously their civic duty/responsibility, and members for whom such duty/responsibility was unimportant. Those in the latter group were called... well, you can look it up here (but please don't think I'm calling you that; I'm not).
Apparently 'they' don't teach that in school anymore because, well... we can't have people today taking such things seriously, right? I mean, what would the culture look like if 'we, the people' actually cared as a community about facts that negatively affected us as a community?
Queen said:I spend my time seeking joy, trying to share time and space with other loving people.
Wishing you peace. :heart:
I'm all for seeking joy and loving people. It's not a mutually exclusive proposition. We can seek joy, and spend time with loving people, and still make time to care about things that negatively affect our community.Does that seem to you a fair conclusion drawn from all this?
And, because I want not to be misunderstood in tone or intent, I want to be very clear that I'm replying thoughtfully vs. off-the-cuff. I'm doing so because I believe that important topics deserve a bit more time and attention. It's been my experience in the past that when I offer a thoughtful reply, some people misinterpret it as unfriendly. That in itself seems to me an indictment of our dominant culture, where thoughtful people who take time to consider an important topic are villified for their consideration. What is this world coming to these days?
To wrap up, it seems to me that there's a time for setting aside the uncomfortable truths about a dysfunctional and declining culture. If anyone was to focus on the negativity exclusively, it may very well drive them mad. I'm not suggesting that any of us go mad, but what I am suggesting is that there's a legitimate context wherein we would do better to come to terms with the facts, and to explore the implications of those facts, then to just shrug-off that opportunity as an irrelevant topic.
If we are a community--a tribe--then what affects any one of us ought to be considered as something important to all of us. If not, then perhaps it would do us all some good to revisit the meaning and implications of 'community' and 'tribe'. I mean, can you imagine a scout comes back from scouting to warn the tribe of impending danger, and some of the members of the tribe are like, 'Oh, well, that doesn't interest me so please respect that'.
It'd be weird, right?