Whelp, my trip was a success on multiple levels. Peace. Quiet. Ample shade. Plenty of sun. Good food. Good drink.
I first used the two 30 watt series that are now hard mounted yet hinged in the luggage rack and had them paralleled with two 30 watt series as portable. Chased the sun with the remotes. Had good results for what it was, 120 watts. Series-parallel, 3.4 nom amps, saw 4.6 from the controller at times.
Gotta love the higher voltages from panels in series and what an MPPT can do.
Used the Max Burton as load and although the vehicle mounted panels lagged at times due to shade, natural and man made for testing, having the two remote panels helped carry things along nicely.
Then I broke out the big guns, the two 100 watt panels, in series. I divorced the wiring for the luggage rack and put away the remote 30's. I set the 100's on the table and let 'er rip. I saw improvements across the board vs the four 30 watt panels. Albeit having more wattage was a bonus.
Charging was easier, The fridge seemed to like knowing it had excess power. For some strange reason, it drew .5 amp less during its run cycle. I backed up the LCD readout on the Rover controller with a clamp on amp meter on the fridge feed wire.
I took eight pages of notes between what the Rover controller was reading and how the Fridge was running/cycling.
I'll have to post that info in the max Burton thread. But it was positive.
I was basically babysitting the solar set up and load draw for three and a half days. I wrote down what time the panels started and stopped producing, fridge run cycle times and when, I learned overcast skies are not the same as shaded panels, amperages at various time(s) vs panel voltage(s) during battery charging of the three stages, (AGM's), including load draws, etc.
What I'm a gonna do is put a selector switch into the controller feed wiring from the panels. One position will allow the two 30 watt luggage rack panels to keep a daily charge on the batteries as well as being able to handle small daily loads if we're out for the day or something.
The second position will be strictly for the remote / portable , one or two, 100 watt panel(s) for increased capacity during longer off-grid stays wherever.
I took ohm readings of the 50' cabling, 10 awg, for the portables and it was at .1 ohm. In contrast, I took a reading of 35' of the 10 awg marine wire I have on hand as extra and it was .1 ohm so all is well there.
These posted results were under near perfect laboratory conditions. I await the time when I can do this data retrieval again in mid winter. Mild where I'm at but it will be a direct contrast to the middle of summer. Fun stuff.
Thanks for reading