BlackNBlue
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 11, 2016
- Messages
- 68
- Reaction score
- 0
I've got leads on two piles of reclaimed polyiso panels. One involves an inconvenient drive to get 4" panels (apparently whole) at $25 each, the other is a very local source for 2.5" panels (mostly partials) at $20 each. Total cost including gas is about $400 vs. $320. This would be going into a step van with nice flat walls, with spray foam to fill any gaps. Plans for the van involve multi-pane skylights, sealable floor vents, no side windows, possibly fans, both a propane and a wood stove, and AC. At first, just the skylights, vents, and propane. The intended climate is montane/continental: both cold and heat (mostly dry heat) will be problems, but more the former.
I have cardwelling experience, but have never worked with insulation like this. How much extra trouble will partial pieces be? I'm guessing not much, but please share your experience.
As a personal general guideline, overkill is better than underkill if it costs about the same. For instance, I shoot deer with a 7.62x54R to ensure they're killed quickly - that is, humanely. Minimized suffering of the animal is worth not having much of a skull left to mount.
My inspirations for this specific task are positive and negative.
Negative: 98% of houses in the US are underinsulated in my opinion (frame of reference: Iceland and Norway). I don't consider it acceptable to torch hundreds of dollars worth of fossil fuels or multiple cords of wood per winter, to maintain reasonable temperatures indoors. That's the product of a wasteful and ignorant culture.
Positive: Passivhaus and R-2000 standards, the apex of which is buildings heated - in proper winter weather, mind - by nothing more than the coils of a refrigerator and body heat. The impression I get is that as total R-value increases, so does the importance of ventilation and airtightness. Bob's article on insulation suggests that too much is a bad thing in hot weather, but based on some houses I've lived in, I think that problem can be solved by good ventilation control: wide open at night, sealed tight during the day.
Am I likely to notice the difference between 4" and 2.5" (R30 and R18, approximately), given two factors?
1. The van will never be airtight, because it's old and I'm not a magician.
2. The roof probably can't be more than 4" thick because of height restrictions. So with 4" panels, the walls/roof/floor would be perhaps 4/4/2 (while 4/7/2 or so would be ideal); with 2.5", 2.5/4/2. I already have a few 2" panels to work with.
The difference is 3" of width, about 3.7% of 7 feet (and even less of the length).
Conventional wisdom is that 1" is plenty. I'm not interested in conventional wisdom - it also tells me to borrow several times my net worth to buy a shoddily-built sticks-n-bricks box, among other things. But I am interested to hear from people who 1. boondock in properly cold climates, 2. who've worked with insulation in comparable settings (vandwellers!), and 3. share the same mentality regarding resource consumption that I do.
I have cardwelling experience, but have never worked with insulation like this. How much extra trouble will partial pieces be? I'm guessing not much, but please share your experience.
As a personal general guideline, overkill is better than underkill if it costs about the same. For instance, I shoot deer with a 7.62x54R to ensure they're killed quickly - that is, humanely. Minimized suffering of the animal is worth not having much of a skull left to mount.
My inspirations for this specific task are positive and negative.
Negative: 98% of houses in the US are underinsulated in my opinion (frame of reference: Iceland and Norway). I don't consider it acceptable to torch hundreds of dollars worth of fossil fuels or multiple cords of wood per winter, to maintain reasonable temperatures indoors. That's the product of a wasteful and ignorant culture.
Positive: Passivhaus and R-2000 standards, the apex of which is buildings heated - in proper winter weather, mind - by nothing more than the coils of a refrigerator and body heat. The impression I get is that as total R-value increases, so does the importance of ventilation and airtightness. Bob's article on insulation suggests that too much is a bad thing in hot weather, but based on some houses I've lived in, I think that problem can be solved by good ventilation control: wide open at night, sealed tight during the day.
Am I likely to notice the difference between 4" and 2.5" (R30 and R18, approximately), given two factors?
1. The van will never be airtight, because it's old and I'm not a magician.
2. The roof probably can't be more than 4" thick because of height restrictions. So with 4" panels, the walls/roof/floor would be perhaps 4/4/2 (while 4/7/2 or so would be ideal); with 2.5", 2.5/4/2. I already have a few 2" panels to work with.
The difference is 3" of width, about 3.7% of 7 feet (and even less of the length).
Conventional wisdom is that 1" is plenty. I'm not interested in conventional wisdom - it also tells me to borrow several times my net worth to buy a shoddily-built sticks-n-bricks box, among other things. But I am interested to hear from people who 1. boondock in properly cold climates, 2. who've worked with insulation in comparable settings (vandwellers!), and 3. share the same mentality regarding resource consumption that I do.