Your post on this diet disturbed me for some time. And I also apologize if this is too far off the subject. <br><br>Your brain and nervous system need carbs to function. You cannot completely eliminate them because you would die.<br><br>The foods you mention eating are very hard for the body to digest. It may be that the weight loss you talk about is working as the Atkins diet worked: Great for immediate loss but not a diet for long term survival.<br><br>I don't mean to disrespect your choices at all. And if it is working for you now, great. But there are a lot of reasons why the diet you just advocated is an extremely unhealthy one for people long term. As well as for diabetics short term.<br><br>The most healthy recommends that I've seen (and I'm a Type II) are a diet based upon plant foods and whole foods: lots of green leafy veggies, whole fruit, lots of beans and legumes, nuts and seed, and a moderate amount of complex carbs. <br><br>Not all carbs shoot the blood sugar sky high. You would have to look at the glycemic index to see which the bad ones are. If your intake of carbs is primarily in simple form like breads, muffins, white rice, and other highly processed foods, then yes your blood sugar would look like a roller coaster if you ate 5 times a day.<br><br>The main problem that I see with the diet you mention is that seems to be completely devoid of the majority of nutrients that we need to survive: mostly the nutrients, minerals and vitamins that exist in plant foods. The American Diabetic Association and associated groups go so far as to recommend a vegetarian or even a vegan diet for diabetics.<br><br>80% fat may indeed have helped you lose weight, and I'm glad that you are healthy now, (congrats!) but I urge you to reconsider this as a lifetime choice.<br><br>Lastly, the diet you recommend is far from green. I'm not sure of the actual statistics (they are easily found as they are published in lots of places), but it takes the food for a large number of people to feed one cow. Additionally, corporate farms for cattle and fowl pollute the environment, use vast resources, and give back a limited supply of product. In other words, they take a lot or scarce resources from us, and give back very little, poisoning the planet as they go. <br><br>And then there are the ethics of the mistreatment of animals to consider. I'm not talking about humane or small family farms, or even hunting, but of the corporate farm, and the effects of a totally animal protein diet on the environment. That is as anti-green as it gets.<br><br>OK, I'll shut up now! thanks for your patience with my response.<br><br><br><br>