Hi all,
OK, an update is in order, and jet lag provides the off-peak opportunity, so here goes.
I spent a good part of yesterday checking out this box truck from a link that Gary68 generously found (thanks again for all of the links, Gary!):
http://phoenix.craigslist.org/cph/cto/5843976804.html
In the end, I did not buy it. I want to explain why, in case it helps others doing this same thing.
--------------------------------
Process:
* Gathered as much info as I could beforehand. Vehicle seemed well worth checking out. Owner is a small dealer and seemed better than most.
* Got out to the vehicle at 9am. Started looking it over and taking photos. Even brought a flat cardboard box to lay down on while inspecting the underside, thanks to good advice I got to do so (nice tip). More on that later.
* Noticed the GVWR was 9,600 lbs. Under 10K - excellent.
* Standing room was about 74" - excellent.
* Pass-through between cab and box already exists. Unexpected bonus. Excellent.
* Box was 10' actually, not 12', unless you count the little bubble part over the cab.
* I completed the inspection top down, finishing cab, engine compartment, box, wheels. All excellent to good. I was planning to crawl under it, but liked what I saw so much that I thought, "My mechanic will check that anyway" and so I skipped it.
* Took the box truck to my mechanic. They spent about an hour crawling up its many orifices for about $100, and issued a report.
* In short, it was a strong "Don't Buy" recommendation. Why? Several things.
- Senior mechanic used the word "rust bucket". The frame had lots of rust with a few places rusted through. Not possible to repair.
- Numerous mechanical things needed repair / replacement (shocks, leaking fluids, etc).
- There was a pile of wiring under the back bumper area. It was such a nightmare that the mechanics estimated $1,000 to repair/replace just that. That estimate sounded exhorbitant, but I think they were tired of this vehicle by then.
- There was evidence that the box truck had been in a front end collision.
- All of the codes in the computer were recently cleared. Could be for a valid reason, but combined with everything else, maybe an attempt to cover things up.
- Speaking of covering things up, it was suggested to me prior to the inspection that the plywood over-floor and wooden wheel well covers might be there to cover up problems. I think it was. The original floor was rotted in places, which matches all of the water / salt damage to the undercarriage.
---------------------------------------------
I learned lots of great stuff from the military, but one was the habit of a non-emotional, improvement-focused final part of every project -- Lessons Learned:
LL # 1. (Re-learned) Appearances can be deceiving, even when 90% of the appearance is great.
For example, a van/truck that looks like this:
http://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4WN6ruUg_W0TlpjYUd0M09rQ2s
http://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4WN6ruUg_W0VzFBY0FhR3daM0k
http://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4WN6ruUg_W0YTdmc3FQb0dzUzQ
-----------
Can also look like this, even in Arizona:
http://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4WN6ruUg_W0VGw2Mm5fSWRGWVU
http://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4WN6ruUg_W0NnF5cVpLdmhmNlk
http://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4WN6ruUg_W0Rk9lT00weF9wVWc
http://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4WN6ruUg_W0UzJUMkx0bks5ZjA
------------------------------
LL # 2: Things aren't always from where you think
I came to the desert specifically to buy a "desert" vehicle. Turns out that the first 10 years of its 13 year life were spent in New York/Vermont on snowy, salty roads. The more I learned about the history, I think this vehicle was rusted badly there, and someone brought it to Phoenix to pass it off as a local vehicle to people not very observant. CarFax was a big help here.
------------------------------
LL # 3: Use CarFax first, not last
Had I done that
and given it more thought, I would have recognized that this wasn't the _type_ of vehicle I was searching for (desert operated). CarFax doesn't have to be a perfect product to tell you accurately where a vehicle comes from.
------------------------------
LL # 4: Deception can look very polite and reasonable
When the whole inspection shebang was over, and I told the owner I couldn't buy the vehicle, he asked why. I explained the inspection report results, which were not equivocal in any way. Some of it I'm sure he already knew. Did he apologize for wasting my time? Or my money on the inspection? No.
His main concern and response: "
I knew I shouldn't let people take my cars to a mechanic."
Really. With no apparent awareness of just how corrupt that sounded. And this guy is a licensed dealer. More info by PM if needed.
------------------------------
LL # 5: Limits of a System:
There is tremendous benefit to a systematic approach to almost everything. However, even the best system will fail if you don't use it consistently. Despite what we might otherwise like to believe, the universe doesn't store up any goodwill from your previous goodness, and shower it upon you when you forget to do the right thing. You can tie your shoes everyday for 50 years, and if you skip once during the 51st year, you'll trip on your dragging shoelaces. The only sure way to fix that is to tie your shoes. What does this have to do with the price of eggs in China (or this topic)? I skipped looking under the truck before I took it to the mechanic for inspection. I didn't forget. I skipped it. Why? Enthusiasm, hopefulness, dizzy with the good luck of finding the right truck the first time out of the chute, and out of practice. Result: I lost at least 4 hours of time and $100 on a formal detailed inspection that really wasn't needed. Ten minutes under that vehicle and I could have made that same decision on my own.
Not angry about the $100 inspection fee. It was tuition, to learn the inspection system and to re-learn to follow my system without fail or enthusiasm.
Thanks a bunch to those who helped me understand what to look for here.
The search continues ...
Vagabound