- Joined
- Sep 2, 2018
- Messages
- 3,895
- Reaction score
- 1,501
Visible is a “real” part of the Verizon company and it uses the “real” Verizon Towers.I wonder if Visible gives coverage in all the same areas where Verizon does or are there some places, very rural areas, where its real Verizon-only. I heard of such things with ATT mnvos.
Yes, all mnvos do that. But it doesnt mean that every single vz tower is made available to mnvo carrier. Thats what my question is about, if there are any differences in coverage.Visible is a “real” part of the Verizon company and it uses the “real” Verizon Towers.
There is deprioritization of mnvos, but I haven't heard of restricting towers... and can't think of a good reason why they'd do that. I think if a Verizon plan can get a signal, then you'd have the same signal strength with Visible, but you may have poorer download speeds.Yes, all mnvos do that. But it doesnt mean that every single vz tower is made available to mnvo carrier. Thats what my question is about, if there are any differences in coverage.
Verizon, which I have/prepaid,is very sneaky with deprioritization and in many towns I cant eveb use google maps on my phone, thats how bad deprioritization is sometimes. Also, prepaid does not get the same coverage as post paid with them. So would not be surprised if they restricted certain areas from mnvos alltogether, if their owers are already overloaded there. It happens with att mnvos. I had no deprioritization with ATT around some areas near Quartzsite, where verizon had 0 speed all day. But Verizon kept refunding me money every time I complainedThere is deprioritization of mnvos, but I haven't heard of restricting towers... and can't think of a good reason why they'd do that. I think if a Verizon plan can get a signal, then you'd have the same signal strength with Visible, but you may have poorer download speeds.
Enter your email address to join: