TrainChaser
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2016
- Messages
- 2,260
- Reaction score
- 1
I can't help it -- I think of strange stuff. :dodgy: (And I just watched Bob's new video about getting the fiberglass hightop put on his van.)
Anyone who has been doing much research on van dwelling probably knows that if lightning is striking nearby, the safest place to be is in a solid building with plumbing, or in your all-metal-shell vehicle. "They say" that if your vehicle is fiberglass (or has a fiberglass hightop), you are in danger from a lightning strike.
Rubber tires are no protection against lightning. The main protection of being in a metal vehicle is the Faraday Effect, where the electrical charge hits your roof or radio antenna, and zooms through the metal shell. You're usually safe if you're not touching anything metal that is attached to the frame of the vehicle. It will fry all of your vehicle electronics, and if you're using a corded (I assume) radio mic, you will get your lips or face fried (it's happened to cops).
Now, getting back to the fiberglass question.....
NOAA and the rest of the scientific community say that if you have a choice of vehicle, getting into a metal vehicle/van is safer than a convertible or a van with a fiberglass hightop.
Problem: I can't find anything that indicates that a van with a fiberglass top has EVER been struck by lightning. I can't find that a fiberglass Corvette has EVER been hit by lightning.
What's going on here? Is it a matter of the patch of metal called the 'roof' attracting the lightning? If so, does that mean that the fiberglass DOESN'T attract lightning? Does it mean that you're probably just as safe in a van with a fiberglass hightop as you are in a regular van? Does it maybe even mean that you're safer, because if lightning doesn't strike fiberglass (and your electronics don't get fried), you won't have to walk down from the Rockies?
Anyone who has been doing much research on van dwelling probably knows that if lightning is striking nearby, the safest place to be is in a solid building with plumbing, or in your all-metal-shell vehicle. "They say" that if your vehicle is fiberglass (or has a fiberglass hightop), you are in danger from a lightning strike.
Rubber tires are no protection against lightning. The main protection of being in a metal vehicle is the Faraday Effect, where the electrical charge hits your roof or radio antenna, and zooms through the metal shell. You're usually safe if you're not touching anything metal that is attached to the frame of the vehicle. It will fry all of your vehicle electronics, and if you're using a corded (I assume) radio mic, you will get your lips or face fried (it's happened to cops).
Now, getting back to the fiberglass question.....
NOAA and the rest of the scientific community say that if you have a choice of vehicle, getting into a metal vehicle/van is safer than a convertible or a van with a fiberglass hightop.
Problem: I can't find anything that indicates that a van with a fiberglass top has EVER been struck by lightning. I can't find that a fiberglass Corvette has EVER been hit by lightning.
What's going on here? Is it a matter of the patch of metal called the 'roof' attracting the lightning? If so, does that mean that the fiberglass DOESN'T attract lightning? Does it mean that you're probably just as safe in a van with a fiberglass hightop as you are in a regular van? Does it maybe even mean that you're safer, because if lightning doesn't strike fiberglass (and your electronics don't get fried), you won't have to walk down from the Rockies?