yesican: Assuming my post on the Rest Stop thread is the one you referred to, the way you've described it is untrue, and the reasons for deletion aren't the ones Kate gave prior to deleting it. She deleted a series of posts concerning a video taken by a passive camera by Santa Fe County, of a New Mexico State Policeman in uniform engaged in sex with a woman on the hood of a car.<BR><BR>Kate explained her reasons for deleting the posts as being her assertion I was "<EM>speculating, stirring the pot, and trolling</EM>". She finished her remark with the clarification, <EM>"That's what I'm thinking."<BR></EM><BR>I have no problem with Kate deleting the post for whatever reasons she might have for doing it. She admitted it was conjecture, or her own thinking, and her job is to make those kinds of judgements.<BR><BR>However, since the post isn't there for examination and for other individuals to form their own judgements about what was said and why it was deleted, seems to me it's inappropriate for you to refer to it at all, but most particularly to describe it in terms suggesting it as something it was not.<BR><BR>And it was not.<BR><BR>However, having said all that, I'm damned glad Kate is doing the job she's doing to keep the site from being a battleground. Even though I've little doubt your post describing my post will be overlooked, or supported, or excused.<BR><BR>But that's because you're you, and I'm me. I have no problem with that style of moderation, so long as Kate continues in her efforts to throw water on the fires. She's welcome to delete posts by me anytime.<BR><BR>Almost certainly including this one.