thebarefootbadger
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2021
- Messages
- 91
- Reaction score
- 123
This is apropos of nearly nothing, but the other day I was reading about multi-age Danish co-housing communities, and it occurred to me how much less expensive it is to do aging in tandem with others. To pool what may be a dwindling supply of skills and resources so that everyone is supported. Or ideally bring new younger members in as the old ones eventually decline and age out. I know, I know, if I'm such a socialist I should move away and so on, God Bless America, and I love my privacy and independence as much as anyone. But seriously, a lot of what we pay for is not our essentials, it's our insistence on going it alone (or the lack of any sort of organized system or support or socialization for doing anything as a non-familial group.) We don't know how to work together in a non-competitive, non-capitalist way, and therefore we don't try.
Just to be clear, I'm not pointing fingers. I thought, a few years ago, in my early 50's, that it would be ideal to be a sextet with friends rather than three separate couples (not romantically, but in a living situation.) Then I thought of how awkward and strange, even creepy, I would sound to even suggest it to my Ameri-normal friends.
Just to be clear, I'm not pointing fingers. I thought, a few years ago, in my early 50's, that it would be ideal to be a sextet with friends rather than three separate couples (not romantically, but in a living situation.) Then I thought of how awkward and strange, even creepy, I would sound to even suggest it to my Ameri-normal friends.
Last edited: