I am going to assume this comment is more wide eyed and innocent and less willful ignorance. Ignoring life's facts and what we know about human nature is risky and dangerous. I have done this more than once(crappy coping skills) and I have never gotten the result I was wishing for.
Splitting hairs about the difference between "spying" and "surveillance" does not actually help anyone in the long run. It may make you feel better about it today(they aren't spying on me, they're surveiling the neighborhood to keep me "safe").
Amazon just received a patent for something they are calling "Surveillance as a Service". I imagine it will be monetized and then we can pay them to keep an eye on us. Safety first!
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” ~ Ben Franklin
“I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.” ~Thomas Jefferson
I am not eloquent or coherent enough to communicate the dangers of a surveillance state. I hope those that are, speak up.(Not here, just in general every day encounters).
Here's a paper discussing the dangers of surveillance. Find link at bottom.
Here's an excerpt...
"But the important point is that our society lacks an understanding
of why (and when) government surveillance is harmful. Existing at-
tempts to identify the dangers of surveillance are often unconvincing,
and they generally fail to speak in terms that are likely to influence the
law. In this Article, I try to explain the harms of government surveil-
lance. Drawing on law, history, literature, and the work of scholars in
the emerging interdisciplinary field of “surveillance studies,” I offer an
account of what those harms are and why they matter. I will move
beyond the vagueness of current theories of surveillance to articulate a
more coherent understanding and a more workable approach."
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2239412