I was gonna chew on this til tomorrow, but it looks like it can't wait. I have been sleeping off and on all day, and too tired to drive up on the hill in order to answer. I realize that was wrong. So here it goes. <br /><br />Dragonfly- yes, I have often cut off subjects prematurely, and sometimes, in retrospect, I was wrong. Sometimes, my stepping in has made things worse...I was the problem. That is why I have held back (well, that and the throwing up) before replying. If I have learned anything, it is to think before I react. As Cheri mentioned (although not about me specifically. I don't think) i have to be careful of my judgementalism even as I caution others to not be judgemental. I'm learning though. <br /><br />Sid- I call them as I see them. Sometimes my decision is made, not on the topic, but on the breaking of the main rule of being nice. Sometimes it is because of off-list email from people pointing out a perspective of the thread that I hadn't considered. Sometimes because some of these squabbles would go on forEVER and ultimately just a few pockets are paying for the privelege of sniping back and forth at each other. <br /><br />Punk-hippie- you are spot on. I think Brian wisely called it first. This topic was baited and I will take this opportunity to suggest that Darrell's troll is showing. More on that in a minute. <br /><br />Freenez- I was asking myself the same question...didn't we take to this lifestyle to escape the narrow view of most of society? I see this as a place to celebrate our differences and our unique worldviews. I tried to contact Darrell off-list with no response, therefore I will go ahead, belatedly, and weigh in on this. <br /><br />I am not sure I can fairly call Darrell's opinion narrow-minded. Sure, that was my first reaction. That, and that he was baiting the pan-handling topic before it even started. But am I judging him? Maybe it is fairer to say Darrell is "other minded" from some of us. that's okay. There are surely many who agree with him. Here's the difference. Most people will see the topic and think "idiots". But they won't say so. Which is in keeping with Bobs rules of niceness and respect. I appreciate and respect that they will honor the dumpster divers' right to have the discussion. What is not acceptable is to jump in and make comments that reflect an opinion of this is why the country is going downhill (paraphrasing, you can go back and see the actual comments). Derogatory comments. If the thread was about "why everyone should dumpster dive" then yeah, jump in and say why it is "wrong". <br /><br />I may be speaking out of turn here, but I've known Bob for long before he started this forum. I know some of the reasons that inspired this forum. Bob wanted a place where information and support could be shared without getting lost in a sea of dialogue. He wanted nice. On-topic. And accessible. Sometimes controversy, especially dialogue that goes beyond attempts to understand and simply become a battle to be right, defeats ALL of those wishes. <br /><br />I do my best to sort it out. <br /><br />Lastly, Cheri, my dear friend. The talk is all OVER the Internet about the temps in the high sierras this year. There's talk of niños and global warming but we all know it's romance! I smile every time I think of you two. Please do me the honor of planting a smooch on that boy in my stead. He can reciprocate. I love you both.