MrNoodly
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2012
- Messages
- 4,967
- Reaction score
- 60
http://www.slate.com/articles/life/...ly_sustainable.single.html#pagebreak_anchor_2<br><br>It's written from the point of view of those who do it -- or try to do it -- by choice. They become tired of the meaninglessness of consumerism. They become tired of the burdens of maintaining that kind of life. Some go extremes, like the guy who lived out of one bag, or a family of three in a 300 square foot apartment. <br><br>But there's a point that could have used more discussion. It's easy to get rid of all those things you were keeping because you might need them someday if you have the money to go out and replace them when you do need them, or if you can afford to pay someone else to repair things. But what if you don't have the money? What should a wise person keep? How many of my tools and supplies should I try to pack into my 60 square foot "apartment?" Would I be a fool to live like a monk? Yes, a van would seem spacious and serene with just a futon and a change of underwear. But can -- and should -- we really live that way fulltime?<br><br>One of my gripes with Jason Odom's "Vanabode" is that he and his wife aren't fulltimers. They take extended excursions away from their house, and when they've had enough they go home. Vandwelling is their hobby. So their van can be very minimalist. It's easy to be zen about it when you do it only a few months at a time.<br><br>I've been downsizing my life for several years. Even before I had any conscious plan to live more simply I'd go on semi-regular binges of getting rid of stuff. One of the wedges between my now-ex-wife and I was that she was comforted my her possessions while I felt liberated by not needing them.<br><br>I'd love to be able to throw a mattress and duffle bag in the back of van and just hit the road. But that kind of minimalist life can end up being expensive.<br><br>What do you folks think?