LeeRevell said:Dusty98, with both of us being "Bigger Than The Average Bear" kind of fellows, if we rode together, we'd need every bit of that one ton truck capacity!! Sometimes, bigger is better!
That is why I went the 2 ton route!
LeeRevell said:Dusty98, with both of us being "Bigger Than The Average Bear" kind of fellows, if we rode together, we'd need every bit of that one ton truck capacity!! Sometimes, bigger is better!
dusty98 said:Ha ha, I'd have to change "Adventurer at Large" to "Large Adventurer"...
http://www.plowsite.com/archive/index.php/t-140508.html
LeeRevell said:Y'all should have seen me haul my large self out of the little Toyota Tercel that Mom passed down to me years ago! Still have it and need to junk it. I looked like a big clown UAing a tiny clowncar!
Made me really appreciate the van!
dusty98 said:Wikipedia says the average Bactrian camels weigh 300 to 1,000 kg (660 to 2,200 lb) and dromedaries 300 to 600 kg (660 to 1,320 lb). I don't know one camel from another, but even on the low end, that little quarter ton truck had at least 1300 pounds and maybe closer to 2000. So yea, a 4 camel truck would be what I'd ask for, payload wise...
dusty98 said:Hey there OP (OP, funny), since you began this on May 1st, have you made a determination yet?
johnny b said:As long as there are no hills, things are OK….but just traveling over a low pass here in Virginia, which a westerner would call a ‘pimple’, requires going down to 2nd gear at 35-40 mph (4 speed auto w/ cooler and 3.73 rear). Also my MPG drops to about 10-11. Looking back I shoulda got the V10.
I can’t imagine how slow I’d have to go if I came out to the Rockies with this set-up.
Without a diesel engine my new rule of thumb is multiply tow capacity by 60% and stay under that for weight of trailer.
I’ll soon be downsizing to a 12 foot (+3 foot V nose) all aluminum trailer before venturing out to the western half of the country.
Hope that helps.
Baloo said:The load equalizing hitch makes a huge difference!
dusty98 said:Baloo, I totally respect your wrenching knowledge. The thing about some of the pickup diesels, maybe it's the emissions crap, but lots of idling is supposed to carbon up the turbos now and is bad for them. Your older generation (same with the 6.9, 7.3 IDI and later 7.3) were ok with idling. All this newer regen crap and extended idling seem to be causing issues. The new ones do make massive power but at what cost? Reliability. The Dodge 12 valve 5.9 motors ran forever with their mechanical fuel systems. Every newer iteration seemed to be worse. Thanks EPA.
Enter your email address to join: