GotSmart
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2014
- Messages
- 5,356
- Reaction score
- 113
Wanderer said:I also got this (At the end of the article)
An earlier version of this post incorrectly stated that the ban had been voted into law; the City Council voted to direct the City Attorney's office to draft an ordinance. The post was also revised to more accurately reflect the fact that the potential ordinance would allow individuals to legally sleep in their cars on streets zoned for industrial or commercial uses.
If I was on the CC, I'd ask the lawyer who sued and won how best to draft it, that way everyone can benefit from this...
This was not on the version I read. No wonder Bob saw something different, It reads completely different now. Early responders to this need to reread it.
I have forgotten that there are no longer gatekeepers to keep personal bias out of reporting. As well as to check the accuracy of what was written.