highdesertranger
R.I.P HDR
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2012
- Messages
- 22,892
- Reaction score
- 89
yes a conversion van and a class B are 2 different things. highdesertranger
progressive obviously doesn't want cooking, pooing, kitchening, heating,,, fridging... being done in what they are insuring --- which is a conversion van... so no one is concerned that when a liability claim comes up ---- say an expensive thousands upon thousands of dollars one --- that they'll say "sorry, we can't cover your claim because your vehicle is not what we insured - which was a conversion van."Uncle Todo said:I think it's more to do with state definitions of an RV and policies for insurance. Companies do vary state to state, but that's because states requirements vary.
Like here's is Virginia's:
""Recreational vehicle" or "RV" means a vehicle that (i) is either self-propelled or towed by a consumer-owned tow vehicle, (ii) is primarily designed to provide temporary living quarters for recreational, camping, or travel use; and (iii) complies with all applicable federal vehicle regulations and does not require a special movement permit to legally use the highways. Recreational vehicle includes motor homes, travel trailers, and camping trailers."
So I just went through on my policy with Progressive because I couldn't remember what is stipulated so I added a vehicle to see.
After check Yes, it's a van equipped with a conversion package, the next page states to be eligible it must not be a vehicle equipped with cooking facilities, drinkable water supply system, bathroom facilities, propane system, refrigeration system, or 110/125 volt electric power system.
Also, if I click "No" to being a van equipped with a conversion package, it just skips ahead and doesn't ask about cooking, water etc.
But being I have liability only, it shouldn't make a difference because regardless they don't pay me anything.
But this is just for example in VA, expect it to be different in your state.
Enter your email address to join: