Yeah I know the epever units you are talking about. I believe they are more tailored to off grid homesteaders. Lots of PV input voltage and big heat sinks also as you'd probably have a bunch of them one adapter to rule them all wouldnt be too big a deal.wayne49 said:The Epever that I am familiar with is a 40A blind, deaf, and dumb (aka headless) unit that requires a separate human interface unit. Like an inexpensive laptop that comes without a display and keyboard.
I thought that the unit mentioned in the thread was similar, since it seemed to need purchasing extra kit to use the full functionality.
Both the Renogy Rover 40 amp and the Rich Solar 40 amp MPPT units require no extra kit.
I think you'll be pleasantly surprised just how much more efficient an MPPT controller is over a PWM controller. Regardless of which one you wind up with if it's at all possible and within the PV voltage input of the MPPT controller I would advise to wire those panels in series. It amazes me how much output I get from mine on cloudy days.Kristalsdreamtrip said:It will still be better to be able to run both panels and will be way more efficient than the pwm I have now.
A PWM controller operates at a relatively constant harvesting efficiency regardless of the size of the array. A PWM controller is less expensive that a MPPT, so is a more economical choice for a small system. A MPPT controller is much less efficient in low power applications.
► Comparing the Two
If maximizing charging capacity were the only factor considered when specifying a solar controller, everyone would use a MPPT controller. But the two technologies are different, each with it’s own advantages. The decision depends on site conditions, system components, size of array and load, and finally the cost for a particular solar power system.
Enter your email address to join: