Just remember that though the government (local, state or national) may be benign now, it might not always be so. No, I'm not trying to get political, nor am I paranoid, but I would like to relay my personal experience just in case others may be able to benefit from it. If the government wants to, there are several ways they can take your property from you. The way they took mine was with excessive property taxes. I live in an area ravaged by Hurricane Katrina. So many people moved out of the area after the storm that the government's tax base suffered. They wanted to raise everyone's property taxes to make up for the lost revenue of all those who left and businesses that closed, but couldn't get the voters to approve a millage increase (cause most residents are not rich by a long shot, recovering from the devastation of the storm.) So what they did to get the revenue they wanted was to reassess everyone's property from what was historically a fraction of it's actual value (something they had never done before) to well over its market value - many times its actual value in some cases. They raised my property taxes 1,000% in one year! No that's not a misprint. Could you afford it if they stuck a zero on the end of your tax bill? I couldn't.
Of course eminent domain laws are often used to seize land the government wants, with reimbursement that does not reflect the land's true monetary value, let alone the sentimental value of land held by your family for generations. This can come from any government agency too. The forest service effectively took some land my wife's family had in California with no reimbursement whatsoever. How did they do it? It butted up against forest service land. About 10 years ago a storm came through causing a stream to flood and destroy a bridge (their bridge) that had stood for years, allowing access to their cabin and property. Since one side was on forest service land, they refused them permission to rebuild the bridge citing environmental reasons. Truthfully, they just wanted them off the land and and seized this opportunity to deny them access to it. They fought it for years, paying to have an environmental impact statement done, etc., but they are still not allowed to rebuild the bridge or access their property to this day. I don't want to discourage anyone, just a word to the wise - make other plans of what you intend to do when they decide to take it, or deny you access to it, because there's a good chance they will, especially if it is wilderness land or adjoins state or federally owned land and they want to expand their land holdings, or simply need the revenue.
Chip