user 36026
New member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2022
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 0
I like this gal's approach - live in it first, then decide what you need. To me, simple is best.
My initial bed was a camping cot. My second iteration consisted of a pipe legs mounted on either end to a sheet of OSB and the plywood flood. The mattress was 6” furniture grade foam. Pricing as of today is $130.Curious on your bed price. What size/type of foam (and plywood) are you referring to? Didn't realize you could get it done for $125
IMHO I think it has more to do with how you are wired:.....I've now lived in that final design for three years -- in my real van -- and have never even thought about changing anything, for it was already perfected in my bedroom .....
Thanks. Just added that foam to my Amazon cartMy initial bed was a camping cot. My second iteration consisted of a pipe legs mounted on either end to a sheet of OSB and the plywood flood. The mattress was 6” furniture grade foam. Pricing as of today is $130.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08HHWDBW5/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07VNBH1HQ/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1
https://www.homedepot.com/p/Oriente...578-in-x-47-75-in-x-95-75-in-691459/205821485
In a third iteration, the old bed became the couch, and the new bed (an upgrade in size and comfort) used a real mattress, $120.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B083V83HMY/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1
So true! Every time I think how nice it would be to have an additional 2' inside, I take another look at a typical parking space and change my mind.And of course I wish it was just a bit bigger on the inside. But not on the outside of course.
I think most of us have the tendency to bring too much stuff with us when we first start out.
Yeah. I have the extended (20-feet-long) Chevy Express 3500, and realize they couldn't put the engine up front under the hood where you could reach it because the long hood would make the van too long. And if the cabin were any shorter, I'd loose some of the furnishings I need, like my clothes washer.Every time I think how nice it would be to have an additional 2' inside, I take another look at a typical parking space and change my mind.
Can't......I wish they had tucked the entire engine back between the front seats, as they did on this 1965 Ford Econoline.....
Glad to know what the sad truth is. Frustrating, but now I can stop searching for who still does it.Can't.
That design doesn't pass federal crash standards.
. . . .
My parents briefly owned a Panel Truck around 1958. I've been wishing I'd been smart enough to find a way to get one to live in during my college years when I was thrown into a dorm where the endless chatter and confusion through the night was driving me nuts. But I wasn't that imaginative or creative. Instead, I escaped it all by dropping out of college.^^^I replaced my 1966 Ford Van with a 1965 Chevy Panel Truck (pickup in the front/cargo van rear) which had two main disadvantages. First it was an old milk delivery truck so geared extremely low. Second because it sat so high in the rear when empty and had no rear windows it was difficult to back up and merge into traffic even with good mirrors. After finishing building it out with an all wood interior and bucket seats and having to repaint the rear quarter twice from backing into things I sold it as well! Lol!!! It was really easy to work on other than being heavy when jacking it up. I now have a 1987 Suburban and pull a homemade 24’ toy hauler which I hope to get on the road soon.
In my van conversion site below there is a check list of handy stuff to have in one's rig:
I didn't think in terms of build, tear up, and rebuild. I thought in terms of the simplest solutions that would meet each of my wants. I didn't "want" a specific size fresh water tank, I wanted running water. I didn't "want" propane, I wanted to the ability to cook food and heat the cabin. I didn't "want" solar, I wanted to run my gadgets. My initial build fulfilled all my initial wants, and that didn't change, but some of the execution evolved over time. And new, unanticipated desires develop that need to be incorporated into the build.I don’t want to build just to tear it up to rebuild.
I think those are excellent points. I also like the idea of creating a space in a room or garage to simulate a van or box. We all evolve and end up wanting something different or easier, bigger or smaller. You are correct that what seems to work out at first may over time no longer be optimal. Especially as we age or add partners or children.I didn't think in terms of build, tear up, and rebuild. I thought in terms of the simplest solutions that would meet each of my wants. I didn't "want" a specific size fresh water tank, I wanted running water. I didn't "want" propane, I wanted to the ability to cook food and heat the cabin. I didn't "want" solar, I wanted to run my gadgets. My initial build fulfilled all my initial wants, and that didn't change, but some of the execution evolved over time. And new, unanticipated desires develop that need to be incorporated into the build.
Without knowing needs based on experience, it's hard to determine the best implementation. For example: solar panels may be great for boondocking days on end in AZ, but no not so useful for urban van dwellers in WI. Another example: a 50 gal water tank may be great if the nearest refilling and dump station is 20 miles away, but a 7 gal tank that can be carried into the laundrymat, grocery store, or restaurant down the block may be more convenient in a different environment.
There will inevitably be mistakes on a first build. If it's conceptualized in the head without the benefit of experience, there will inevitably be revelations that will occur after being on the road. If the initial build was "all out" the choice will be to either live with it or make costly corrections. In my opinion, it's better to do a build in the simplest way that achieves the desired result.
Enter your email address to join: