Ticklebellly said:
Dingos do not belong to the dog genus. Reputed to have been brought to the Australian mainland across the land bridge around 25,000 years ago, although one theory puts their arrival much later.
the dingos current scientific taxonomic classification is Canis lupis dingo, while the grey wolf is classified as Canis lupis, and dogs are Canis lupis familiaris
note that the break down is genus, species then in the case of the dog and dingo subspecies. so, not only are dingos from the same genus, they are scientifically regarded as the same species, just a different sub species than dogs. this is the current accepted scientific taxonomic classification. i agree that classifications change, and there is a small group of 20 or so researchers claiming dingos as a distinct species Canis dingo, yet that is still the same genus "Canis". their argument is based on a few thousand years genetic isolation in Australia. the oldest evidence is a 3500 year old cave art. there is no evidence or even suspicion of significantly earlier arrival. they also point to physical differences based on skull measurements and such. this argument is also fostered by claims that dingo populations that have been genetically polluted through hybridization tend to revert rapidly to look like dingos if the source of hybridization is removed. these are valid arguments but not yet substantiated and accepted widely enough to support a change in the taxonomic classification. the following is just one link that supports the separate species classification.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/03/190305100635.htm
while the above mentioned line of thinking is based on physical attributes and isolation, which has some merit, especially in pre genetic testing days. the current taxonomic classification is supported by significant genetic testing showing enough shared genes between dogs, dingos and wolves to be classified as the same species and all descending from a common ancestor. although a more recent full sequencing of their genomes still shows dogs, dingos and wolves to be from the same ancestor. it showed the dingo and dog to be much closer related to each other than either is to the wolf. one suggested implication of this is that dogs and wolves diverged from each other much longer ago than had been previously accepted. quite possibly through domestication by hunter gatherers. then when dogs were introduced to Australia 3500 some odd years ago by ancient seafarers and became isolated they continued to evolve and adapt through a few thousand years of genetic isolation into the dingo we know today. a distinct species? maybe, but not because they evolved independently on the Australian continent, but because they diverged far enough back to exhibit significant changes. possibly enough to warrant separate species classification. it is interesting to note, if you didnt catch it, that the recent genetic sequencing indicates wolves, dogs and dingos share a common ancestor they all descended from. not necessarily the the wolf is the common ancestor. the following link is just one article along these lines
https://www.australiangeographic.com.au/blogs/austropalaeo/2014/05/dawn-of-the-dingo/
genetics and evolution is fascinating, far more interesting and complicated than 4 pea plants...