DanDweller
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2018
- Messages
- 119
- Reaction score
- 0
Has anybody here tried the Nanoflex?:
I can understand that thinking. On the other hand, after having just had a phone conversation withDan Harris, owner of Carmeltint in Carmel, Indiana, I'm more keen than ever to try the Nanoflex. He has no reason to puff or lie to me--someone in Salt Lake City who won't be his customer since I'm not in Indiana. He has had zero warranty claims (except for one claim on an earlier, discontinued version of the Panaflex, another line carried by the same company, which was bubbling). The issue some have with it (but also with other competitor films) is a small, but insignificant amount of low angle haze. If I am to believe Dan's and Ralphs' thoughts on that, it is the inevitable price you pay if your film is blocking out that much heat. In all the tests, Nanoflex performs better than 3M Crystalline. I don't think they are lying. Anyway, I'll be the guinea pig and report.maki2 said:I would be much more inclined to spend the extra money and invest in the products from 3M than to try an off-brand. At least you know for sure that 3M does extensive testing in professional quality laboratory conditions with top notch equipment and trained engineering staff. Also the quality control and equipment in the manufacturing facilities is top notch. Sometimes the extra price is worth it.
Enter your email address to join: