Belchfire said:
Which is best for reliability cost of repair and mpg?
Well, when you put it that way.....
Reliability: "Best" for reliability is a crap shoot. One really can not find a fault with any of the drive lines used in any "step van". From Chevrolet to Ford, Cummins powered or International, I don't think anyone could say one was more reliable than the other.
When people ask "reliability", they often are focused on engine and transmission. If there was any one or two potential problem engine/transmissions, I'd say the 6.2L GM diesel and probably the early GM 700R4's. Both of those areas were improved with a follow-up version in the 6.5 and 480LE. The company I worked for had a 6.5 in a Boyertown Body (junk compared to Grumman) and that thing ran great. The 480LE's also had issues though... I've seen plenty of those fail compared to the older three speed autos. I do not think there was a standard trans that was or had any particular issue.
Rear axles need work occasionally, but they are never the component that causes a routine problem. Same goes for front axles. They are new once, and can be successfully rebuilt time after time with long lasting results.
Cost to repair: Hands down winners here are pre-1985 trucks with Ford or Chevy drive lines. Simple, common well known engines like the 350 Chev, 351 Ford, 300 Ford Six and or 292 Chev are hard to beat for low repair costs. Out of all of them, the 350 Chevy probably has the edge as there is not one corner of the continent you could go and not find affordable parts or complete engines ready to go.
Grumman did put a 250ci Six in some of the really small step vans, but frankly, that engine never seemed to impress me and I have had a few. Not to worry there much as most of the really small step vans were used so hard in short door to door work, very, very few remain and usually only as novelties. Very cute, but expensive to find in good shape.
A note here about the BODY... I'd run from any step van with a steel body unless your goal is a vintage International Metro. There you would have little choice, though I did own a 1956 International Metro-Lite that had an advanced body made from Fiberglass, Aluminum and MAGNESIUM side walls ! Incredible for 1956. See it here:
http://data-cut.com/projects/step/sm122.html
The BODY is what could cost you the most to repair if it is a pile of corroded aluminum or rusted steel... even a pile of cracked fiberglass.
MPG: There is no winner in MPG beyond the 4BT powered Grummans. I have heard stories of people hitting 28mpg with them, but had not experienced that with the one I drove. I do not care the brand or driveline, the best answer that can be given is to expect between 8 and 12 mpg for Gas powered and 10 to 15 mpg for any V8 diesels. I personally do not beleive the diesels are worth it in this size truck UNLESS you plan on being over 10,000 lb gross weight. If you have space for a full size bus instead, your better off with one as something like a big six cylinder DT466 will pull that much larger bus doing between 8 and 12 mpg's as well.
Again, to meet ALL of your "best" criteria, I'd be recommending a 1980 - 1984ish Grumman Bodied, 350/TH400 Chevy powered, Independent front suspension, 10,000lb max truck. NOTHING else will come in with lower costs to keep on the road. All you need to do is find one that was very well taken care of, and that is a feat in itself as time goes by. The MPG aspect is only one part of the entire equation. If 8-12 mpg's scare you, a Step, or practically any truck for that matter may not be for you. Perhaps a mini-van ? Old Chev Ventures, Chrysler T&C's... Windstars... they get 25-28 with a good driver. Chevy Astro's... Seems every AWD I had was better on fuel that the 2WD's... and between 16 and 20mpg max.
Be aware that ALL Step van brands could be had in 100's of combinations. Below is just a few examples from my 1980's literature:
The Kurbmaster Jr. was a 74" inside wide truck that came on Ford drivelines of 104" and 122" Wheelbases, and body lengths of 8', 9' 10'. Chevy was a 102" WB, and 7' and 8' Length.
Standard 78" inside wide Kurbmasters on Chevy came in 125", 133" and 157" WB, with body lengths in 9', 10. 11', 12', 13', 14' 15' and 16'. These were almost 73" high inside. Ford had even more combinations for the "78" series". You find these trucks to have the "Flippers" added when duals were used as the tires just hung outside the body by a smidget.
The 86 series is where things really fit the conversion world. Chevy came in 125", 133" and 157" WB, with body lengths in 9', 10. 11', 12', 13', 14' 15' and 16', BUT also added height options of 6", 8" and 12" above standard. Again, Ford too, options were massive.
THESE are the perfect truck for width and height when the 8" top was included (81" Inside). This WIDTH truck allowed the dual wheels to fully fit UNDER the body, allowing you to lower the truck for "camper" use easily.
This is what my last Stepvan was (and one prior):
http://data-cut.com/projects/step/Grumliner.html (
http://data-cut.com/Images/step/Old1.jpg)
Of course there are more lengths.... 18' to nearly 30 foot trucks out there, and the variations can be mind blowing. You just have to look at each truck one at a time and ook carefully for rust and corrosion issues. All mechanicals can be fixed.
If money was no object these days, I would be looking for a used "Command Center":
https://www.google.com/search?q=fre...mJHhAhUIZawKHf6PCr0Q_AUIDigB&biw=1366&bih=592