Reflectix question

Van Living Forum

Help Support Van Living Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Tomcor

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 22, 2015
Messages
245
Reaction score
0
I have a Ford conversion van. I would like to install Reflectix on all the side and back windows.
It comes in 24" and 48". Is anyone using the 24" and joining it together at the seam with tape or reflectix joiner tape? Or is it best to use the 48" inch? Also is it best mounted with the lines going vertically like this (I). I removed all the rear seating and slowly working on it. Been 109 degrees here in NV.
 
no seams are always better than seams. seams are always the weakest link. highdesertranger
 
Assuming your windows are bigger than 24 inches, yes, I would use the 48 inch instead. Quite a few independent hardware stores sell it by the foot so you may look around for that. But them about 1/2 inch too big around all sides and you can just compress it into the window frame.

I can't imagine that the ways the line go would make any difference.
Bob
 
Tomcor said:
I have a Ford conversion van. I would like to install Reflectix on all the side and back windows.
It comes in 24" and 48". Is anyone using the 24" and joining it together at the seam with tape or reflectix joiner tape? Or is it best to use the 48" inch? Also is it best mounted with the lines going vertically like this (I). I removed all the rear seating and slowly working on it. Been 109 degrees here in NV.

If you're just looking to block the windows, reflectix will work, if you're wanting to stay cooler, parking in the shade is the better than any amount of insulation.
 
Hi Tomcor,

We have a conversion van too and I used the 24" reflectix. It doesn't make any difference if it has a cut or not if it is cut to the right size. Reflectix has a way of snuggling on the window frame so it stays in place. I don't think the direction of the cut makes any difference. When I taped the 2 pieces of the reflictix together I used tape on one side only, this way it's easier to fold in 2 for storage. I used dock tape. One think I did is sew fabric on both side to change the look. I wasn't too keen on the silver look.

Good luck on your build.

-Nicole
 
The way Reflectix works is it literally reflects the heat. If you look at it in the sun it reflects so much light it is blinding. If you cover it with fabric it is no longer reflecting the light/heat, it is absorbing it. It almost totally losses its value by covering it with material or painting it black. Covering one side for night use and leaving one side silver for day use is a very good idea.

If you are going to cover it, a much better idea is styrfoam covered with fabric. It has a much higher R-value. The R value of covered Reflectix is very low.
Bob
 
Very good information Bob, I never looked at it that way. I only use the reflectix as a window covering at night but I'll keep that in mind for day time.

-Nicole
 
Off Grid 24/7 said:
If you're just looking to block the windows, reflectix will work, if you're wanting to stay cooler, parking in the shade is the better than any amount of insulation.

Technically true.  However, not everyone here has the luxury of parking in the shade all day.  Some of us want to live this life in order to travel widely.  I don't expect to find much shade in Death Valley.

A well insulated rig will stay just as cool as an uninsulated rig will when parked in the shade.  And will serve you better when you can't find any shade.

Regards
John
 
Optimistic Paranoid said:
A well insulated rig will stay just as cool as an uninsulated rig will when parked in the shade.  And will serve you better when you can't find any shade.

Regards
John

I would feel more comfortable saying: "A well insulated rig will get just as WARM as an uninsulated rig will when parked in the shade. 

I think insulation is highly overrated. No matter how well insulated a small RV is, at the end of the day it'll be as warm inside as when moderately insulated. Insulation also keeps the hot air longer inside at night. 

Key to comfort is appropriate ventilation by means of (forced) convection.

Van Williams
 
Optimistic Paranoid said:
Technically true.  However, not everyone here has the luxury of parking in the shade all day.  Some of us want to live this life in order to travel widely.  I don't expect to find much shade in Death Valley.

A well insulated rig will stay just as cool as an uninsulated rig will when parked in the shade.  And will serve you better when you can't find any shade.

Regards
John

If you're somewhere there is no shade, then you're also somewhere you can create your own shade, like out in the desert.
 
cargovanconversion said:
 Insulation also keeps the hot air longer inside at night. 
  If one has no ventilation, then and only then, this is true.  But what logic is there in having no ventilation in hot weather?
This 'insulation has no effect on keeping the interior cooler, and only acts to keep the interior hotter at night, Holds no water in my opinion. 
Without insulation, the interior will get significantly hotter, and then have more heat to re radiate  when the sun lowers and things cool off.
If the insulation can slow the rate at which the interior absorbs the heat, and it remains even a few degrees cooler, these same interior objects will then have less heat energy to reradiate to the interior.
Parking in the shade/ making shade is not always an option.  Any efforts which reject heat from making it to the interior are worthwhile. And this same insulation which can reduce the radiated heat from cooking everything inside like a convection oven, would only retain the heat inside, if one has NO ventilation, no ability to exchange outside air for inside air.
If it is hot enough that this is an issue, but someone insists on not having any method of exchanging inside air for outside air, then one seriously needs to rethink their ability to employ logic, much less share their faulty logic and present it as fact.
 
you know what, I will finally reply to this logic of no insulation. anybody who thinks no insulation is better than insulation is naïve at best. given the same wall in the sun the one with no insulation transfer much more heat to the interior than an insulated wall. then to say that the heat stays trapped, is plain wrong unless we are talking about an sealed vehicle. another point is if it's hot out what are you doing cooped up inside. get out. I sleep out side unless it's raining or snowing so hard I can't, and then I want a well insulated vehicle. I consider insulation more of a cold weather thing, cause like I said if it's hot what are you doing inside. I insulate my floor boards and firewall too. to keep the engine and transmission heat out. are you saying this is a bad idea? I really don't like tents in the summer why because seconds after the sun hits them it is stifling inside. why, because there is no insulation. I do see the value of parking in the shade when it's hot or the sun when it's cold. but many times I am in the desert where there is zero shade. if you are in a snow storm or blizzard there is no sun, so parking in the sun is not an option. I just don't get this no insulation thing is better. if it's cold out what do you do, put on more layers. what is that, I will tell you it's insulation to hold your body heat in. com'on it's common sense it not rocket science. highdesertranger
 
You're Ok using it in the windows. It only does any good when it can reflect sunlight.

Reflectix as wall and ceiling insulation is a waste of money. Did NOTHING for my GMC Motorhome. High density foam board or Denim insulation work. Spend your money and time on something that works.
 
Read up on Emissivity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emissivity

A silver surface does more than block light. It also radiates very little heat, and as such, reflectix on the inside of a hot surface will radiate much less heat to the interior, than if it were spray painted black. Even if the reflectix is covered with another product, it will radiate less heat from its surface to the product covering it.

Yes there are certainly better insulators than reflectix, but calling it useless at anything but reflecting sunlight is not true.
The degree of usefulness can be argued.
 
SternWake said:
  If one has no ventilation, then and only then, this is true.  But what logic is there in having no ventilation in hot weather?
This 'insulation has no effect on keeping the interior cooler, and only acts to keep the interior hotter at night, Holds no water in my opinion. 
Without insulation, the interior will get significantly hotter, and then have more heat to re radiate  when the sun lowers and things cool off.
If the insulation can slow the rate at which the interior absorbs the heat, and it remains even a few degrees cooler, these same interior objects will then have less heat energy to reradiate to the interior.
Parking in the shade/ making shade is not always an option.  Any efforts which reject heat from making it to the interior are worthwhile. And this same insulation which can reduce the radiated heat from cooking everything inside like a convection oven, would only retain the heat inside, if one has NO ventilation, no ability to exchange outside air for inside air.
If it is hot enough that this is an issue, but someone insists on not having any method of exchanging inside air for outside air, then one seriously needs to rethink their ability to employ logic, much less share their faulty logic and present it as fact.

highdesertranger said:
you know what,  I will finally reply to this logic of no insulation.  anybody who thinks no insulation is better than insulation is naïve at best.  given the same wall in the sun the one with no insulation transfer much more heat to the interior than an insulated wall.  then to say that the heat stays trapped,  is plain wrong unless we are talking about an sealed vehicle.  another point is if it's hot out what are you doing cooped up inside.  get out.  I sleep out side unless it's raining or snowing so hard I can't,  and then I want a well insulated vehicle.   I consider insulation more of a cold weather thing,  cause like I said if it's hot what are you doing inside.  I insulate my floor boards and firewall too.  to keep the engine and transmission heat out.  are you saying this is a bad idea?  I really don't like tents in the summer why because seconds after the sun hits them it is stifling inside.  why,  because there is no insulation.  I do see the value of parking in the shade when it's hot or the sun when it's cold.  but many times I am in the desert where there is zero shade.  if you are in a snow storm or blizzard there is no sun,  so parking in the sun is not an option.  I just don't get this no insulation thing is better.  if it's cold out what do you do,  put on more layers.  what is that,  I will tell you it's insulation to hold your body heat in.  com'on it's common sense it not rocket science.  highdesertranger

I did expect some reactions on the insulation issue, but my comments were misinterpreted.

But what logic is there in having no ventilation in hot weather?
Clearly there is a relationship between insulation and ventilation as I stated, but I think that ventilation is much more important to keep the interior cool.

insulation has no effect on keeping the interior cooler
Insulation may keep it cooler longer, but eventually the temperature catches up inside. Only ventilation and in my opinion especially "natural and/or forced convection" produces the best results in off-grid situations.

If the insulation can slow the rate at which the interior absorbs the heat, and it remains even a few degrees cooler
Insulation will slow heat penetration, yet at the end of a hot day the interior temperature catches up, in my experience. Keeping it a cooler is by means of ventilation, not insulation.

Parking in the shade/ making shade is not always an option.
Correct! Parking in the shade should be the first thing to consider, but is often not an option or desired as in off-grid situations, many of us have solar and thus dependent om the sun.

Any efforts which reject heat from making it to the interior are worthwhile.
Correct! but as I said, "I think insulation is highly overrated". I certainly don't propose to refrain from insulating an RV. It has its appropriate uses and a moderate application is wise in any situation.

but someone insists on not having any method of exchanging inside air for outside air, then one seriously needs to rethink their ability to employ logic, much less share their faulty logic and present it as fact.
You completed misread my statement. I talked about overhyping insulation, yet increase ventilation.

anybody who thinks no insulation is better than insulation is naïve at best. 
Again, I don't propose eliminating insulation.

then to say that the heat stays trapped
I say remove through ventilation, but insulation doesn't help at that time.

I consider insulation more of a cold weather thing
I agree with you on that completely and I should have stated that my remarks focused on warmer locations.

What it all comes down to, is insulation and ventilation are two separate issues. I think over-insulation of your RV is unnecessary and may even lead to other problems. Ventilation should be a priority.

Van Williams
 
glad you clarified CVC, I might have misinterpreted part of your post but my post was basically meant for others you spew all kinds of faslehoods about insulation. I whole heartily agree about ventilation. highdesertranger
 
Let's agree to disagree. And let's be kind to each other.


Van Williams

[font=Segoe UI, sans-serif]Truth doesn't exist, it's all about perception![/font]
 
Top