and that is the crux of it: 'our mere existence'. --- as IF "our mere (physical) existence" is somehow a problem ??lenny flank said:I don't see any harm in minimizing our impact wherever possible, in whatever form that takes.
It's a mere truism that our impact will NEVER be "zero", ever, no matter what we do--simply because we exist, and our mere existence has an impact.
Ideological purity, of any sort, quickly leads to silliness.
Apparently so. According to science worshippers...
Their model/truism dictates that humanity ought be "managed, & controlled" in any context(s) & by any means disciples can cook up.
BLM as one such.
and failing that, ultimately banned/annihilated. Yes, no more humans will solve EVERY thing. And that ideological snafu they dare call "truth".
I rest my case, Your Honor.