Let me make a case against the urine diverting toilet compared to an everything in one bucket toilet. First, finding places and discreetly emptying a container of urine can be a hassle, especially in urban areas. Second, males have to sit down in order to direct the stream into the funnel area and females have to position their bodies over the correct openings. Third, urine containers can emit odors if not sufficiently sealed. Fourth, a urine diverting toilet has more parts that need cleaning: the funnel, the urine jug. Fifth, having an open bottle of urine sloshing around in a vehicle is not ideal.
I use my van everyday and I hate public bathrooms, so my toilet gets a fair amount of use. The toilet is a 5 gal bucket enclosed in a wood box/ottoman. I use an ordinary kitchen trash bag and line the bottom with 2” of cedar pellets. That’s it. I don’t do anything else other than toss the bag into the trash every 7-10 days. The pellets slowly disintegrate into sawdust as it absorbs the moisture of multiple urine deposits. There is no odor, except of the wood pellets themselves. That's why I choose cedar instead of pine (which is cheaper and just as effective).
I don’t hesitate to poop in my van, but with my usage pattern, it doesn’t happen very often. My toilet box isn’t vented to the outside, so poop will smell, at least until it dries out. I throw extra pellets on top of it to facilitate the process, but I don’t like the idea of driving around with a bucket of crap, so I usually dump it within a few hours of its creation. This isn’t a big deal since I’m rarely more than an hour away from a trash can.
Although I don’t use a pee bottle, I appreciate it's simplicity (and lid). If I boondocked in places where it was appropriate to dump urine on the ground, I’d probably use a pee bottle and reserve the bucket toilet just for poop. I just don’t see the advantage of a urine diverting toilet.