pnolans said:
Not all of the time, not for everybody. Especially when you DON'T have a sticks and bricks home and are using it as a tool to help you actually decide what you need and what you don't.
One thing about this community .. one size does NOT fit all. Everyone has a unique situation.
I guess it wasn't clear that I was saying MY money was well-spent on an organizer, and FOR ME putting stuff in storage would be a waste. Other people can do whatever floats their boat, but... I do happen to know people who have more than one storage unit and aren't even sure what's in them - they hold onto them out of FEAR that they'd be letting go of something valuable or that they will miss terribly, or simply because they've spent money on those things and don't want to "lose" what they've spent by getting rid of it. I found working with a professional organizer very beneficial because she helped me face some of those irrational fears I have around letting go of the things I've accumulated.
Mainly, for ME, it's about... "Sunk Cost Fallacy," a principle in Economics that says when you've paid for something, you've already sunk money into it, and so there isn't much money you can get back. You either use the item or not. Either way, the costs are already "sunk." Sunk costs = costs that have been incurred in the past and cannot be recovered. Basically, although you've already spent the money, if the item is no longer useful to you, or is sitting around collecting dust until it can be used, you might as well let it go. It's a FALLACY to think that a needless item must be kept JUST BECAUSE you've sunk costs into it. That seems very much related to SCARCITY THINKING to me.
Okay, so maybe it isn't a totally useless item, because I could use it SOMEDAY. I just can't use it YET or while traveling around. But does that really mean it is useful to me? Is it really worth it to hang onto it for months or years, paying someone to hold it for me, adding to the money I've sunk into it?
How is it earning its keep? How am I benefiting from squirreling away physical possessions that I am not using? These are good questions each person can ask themselves to figure out what they should do.
Storing things at a facility might be a fine and sensible thing to do for some people who, like you say, need to have some stuff to return to while figuring out what exactly they need. I guess what you're describing would be like going on test runs, discarding what wasn't used on trips, and going back to the storage unit to pick up what they wished they had. Cool. That sounds like a more practical plan for the future than a wistful one - but might not seem so practical if those belongings wind up languishing in storage for years!
gsfish said:
$255 -$340 a month will rent one heck of a storage unit!
Well, storage in NYC ain't cheap, but anyway, I did not spend that amount every month! Just in spurts, maybe two or three months in a row when I could budget it in, and then maybe six to ten months went by before I hired her again. It was a process and it was always a good, productive, life-affirming experience - very akin to therapy. Letting go of my emotional attachment to THINGS is a challenge and not easy, just as much as getting rid of some things can be physically challenging as well (living in a walk-up apartment building). We worked hard and intensely whenever she came over. I am not sure stashing my crap in a big warehouse-like building would have felt as positive in the same way as it did to face those attachments and fears about letting stuff go. FOR ME. Besides, even if I found a unit for $100/month, but was gone a year, that's $1200/year for my stuff to just sit there, unused. FOR ME, I'd rather pay someone to help me let go rather than hold things for me.
Related to the concept of Sunk Cost Fallacy... I think that, also, for most people who need to downsize out of a stationary home in order to start over somewhere else (whether on the road or just moving to a smaller place), it may be, PERHAPS, better to exercise the Bygones Principle, a theory which is about not looking backwards. Economists argue that sunk costs should not be taken into account when making rational decisions. The Bygones Principle demands that a person calculate with a VERY CLEAR eye the extra costs and benefits one will incur in the future when weighing decisions to be made now, and lets "bygones be bygones," basically by NOT looking back at what was spent in the past and NOT letting that influence the decision-making process.
It's sort of like... you can't move forward by ONLY looking in the rear view mirror - you need to see what's around you and in front of you in order to get where you're going safely. So, basically, you would set aside what you paid for things and/or how much emotional energy you've attached to things, and forget about that. Then, see what the costs and benefits are for storing things. If you decide to remove a useless item from your home, and NOT store it, you are thereby freeing up more space to be yourself, live your life, incubate new ideas, etc., and not letting SUNK COST control you. That's the concept, anyway. But storing it ties you to it and, therefore, you are not totally free of it.
Just my two cents - not telling anyone what to do.
Personally, FOR MYSELF, I am adamantly opposed to paying for storage. IMO, the cost of storage doesn't always make sense for stashing items that rapidly depreciate in value or could be better put to use by someone in need, or someone who could use and enjoy it. There really isn't much of anything I own that I feel is worth paying for storage - and there is always the chance that the storage company could go out of business without notice and I would lose my possessions. When I do finally get going, give up my apartment, and head down the road, there may be a small amount of things I might wish to ask a relative to hold for me. I will rethink that, though.
I am heavily leaning toward selling as much of my crap as I can, donating some of it, and ultimately letting go of everything. I will probably work with my organizer again to get me toward that goal.
I also have the option of subletting my apartment while not living in it, which would mean that someone else is living here and paying the rent on my lease and it would still be in my name when I come back. I am legally allowed to charge 10% above my rent if I leave furniture for the sublettor to use. My apartment is in Manhattan, and very cheap because I've lived here for eons - but I already decided to leave it altogether and not sublet, so I will end my lease. The landlord will gut-renovate it after I leave and raise the rent ridiculously high, and I may never be able to afford Manhattan again - it's been my home for over a quarter-century but I realized that holding onto this apartment won't bring me joy. It just isn't worth holding onto anymore, and it's been very freeing to say, "I'm done." Now, THAT was a big decision for me.
Anyway, to stay more on topic, if anyone is thinking about hiring an organizer for help with downsizing, it could be the best thing you ever did. It's been very rewarding for me. Check out
www.napo.net (National Association of Productivity and Organizing Professionals), call around for rates in your area and ask organizers about their approach.
Another type of professional is the kind of person who helps arrange estate sales or garage sales.
There are professional associations that can direct you to experienced companies that can manage selling the contents of your home: check out
http://www.nesa-usa.com and
https://www.aselonline.com .